The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013)

• Year: 2013
• Released: 13 Dec 2013
• Country: New Zealand, United States
• Adwords: Nominated for 3 Oscars. 19 wins & 90 nominations total
• IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1170358/
• Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/The_Hobbit_The_Desolation_of_Smaug
• Metacritics: https://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-hobbit-the-desolation-of-smaug
• Available in: 3D, 720p, 1080p
• Language: English
• MPA Rating: PG-13
• Genre: Adventure, Fantasy
• Runtime: 161 min
• Writer: Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson
• Director: Peter Jackson
• Cast: Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage
• Keywords: based on novel or book, forest, dragon, bear, sword and sorcery,

	7.8/10
	66/100
	74% – Critics
	85% – Audience

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Storyline

Thorin and his company are being pursued by Azog and his Orc party following the events of the previous film. They are ushered along by Gandalf to the nearby home of Beorn, a skin-changer who can take the form of the bear. That night, Azog is summoned to Dol Guldur by the Necromancer, who commands him to marshal his forces for war, so Azog delegates the hunt for Thorin to his son Bolg. The following day, Beorn escorts the company to the borders of Mirkwood, where Gandalf discovers Black Speech imprinted on an old ruin. Heeding a promise he made to Galadriel, he warns the company to remain on the path and leaves to investigate the tombs of the Nazgûl. Upon entering the forest, the dwarfs lose their way and are ensnared by giant spiders. Bilbo sets about freeing them with the help of his recently acquired invisibility ring. He subsequently drops the ring and first begins to understand its dark influence after he brutally kills a creature to retrieve it..

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Play trailer

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Photos

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Torrents Download

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Subtitles Download

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Movie Reviews

A Mile a Minute

After reading some of the previous reviews, I wonder what it takes to engage the modern viewer. It seems we have become so jaded that we see the necessity of giving a one star review to something as phenomenal as this film is. It is filled with action, sets of remarkable creativity, amazing characters, in a complex plot that made me long for the conclusion. I know it doesn’t follow the book religiously. Get over that. Even a fifteen hour miniseries based on a novel fails miserably. Of course, every English teacher on the planet knows that we are working in two entirely different mediums. Books and movies are different! What Peter Jackson has done is taken the primary plot and allowed his script writers to take what is given and supplement it with their own creativity. The first film, though imperfect, does set the stage for this superior second effort. What we get is nonstop action, moving the characters toward the object of their quest. Tolkien’s rules are followed if not the letter of the plot. The first film was criticized for being too talky. Now this one is being criticized for not being talky enough. For me, the scene where the gang must escape an elven prison and face the orcs is one of the most delightful fifteen minutes I’ve ever spent in a movie theater. I don’t expect an action film based on a book with voluminous characters to have character development like “Driving Miss Daisy.” See the film for what it is and count yourselves lucky to have the luxury of being able to see the amazing accomplishments of the Peter Jackson’s of the world.

Some disappointing things, many good things and one magnificent asset- liked it very much

Having really enjoyed An Unexpected Journey, though it was a long way from perfect, last year, a family cinema outing for this was guaranteed. And it was worth the wait, Dad and I liked it a little less than my brother, sister and godparents(die-hard LOTR and Hobbit fans by the way) but all of us found a lot to enjoy, more so than An Unexpected Journey. Desolation of Smaug also shares imperfections, Azog is still a very one-dimensional villain and doesn’t add a lot to the story(Bolg is no better either actually); the love triangle felt forced and shoe-horned in for the sake of it, including a bit that is like an inferior copy of Arwen and Arogorn; Beorn is criminally underused and any signs of development with him is rushed; the Mirkwood scene is far too short though the atmosphere was good; Gandalf deserved more to do with only his encounter with Sauron and perhaps the beginning really standing out for him; and the ending is very abrupt with a pointless, too long and really overly-silly battle between Smaug and the dwarfs(Smaug’s final line was incredibly chilling though!).

Moving on from the debits, the film does look amazing. I liked that we saw more locations and that the film has a softer, darker yet more storybook-like feel to it than An Unexpected Journey. The attention to detail in the costumes, make-up and sets(Laketown is fantastic) is remarkable, the photography is beautifully transitioned and atmospheric and most of the special effects are great, especially with Smaug, Sauron and the spiders and excepting the flowing gold and maybe Azog. The music in equal turn is ethereal and haunting, not the most memorable stuff that Howard Shore has written but it fits perfectly within the film. The script has a better balance between the comedic and dramatic, in fact the humour is subtle while taking much more of a serious approach than to An Unexpected Journey without being too morose. It’s thought-provoking too, and Smaug’s lines especially in his taunting of Bilbo and when Bilbo implores him from not attacking Laketown are just chilling.

The story gets much more to the point than in An Unexpected Journey and the pacing is swifter with generally more dramatic tension(if not always consistent). There are some great set pieces too, Bilbo’s encounter with Smaug is the highlight of the film, tense and brilliantly written, though the spider scene is appropriately sticky and matches it in tension, Gandalf’s encounter with Sauron was brief but visually stunning and the barrel-on-the-river scene while on the over-exaggerated side is a lot of fun, inventive and thrilling. The acting is good, Martin Freeman is still appealing in a curmudgeon sense, Ian McKellen is still perfect as Gandalf(even doing things that you do not expect someone of his age to still do, but he should have had more to do), Richard Armitage is a brooding presence and succeeds in showing Thorin’s worse qualities and Ken Stott stands out among the dwarfs, he is fun and wise here. Orlando Bloom has some charisma, Lee Pace plays the morally ambiguous character of Thranduil just right(he does come across as a douche but from a moral perspective he is an interesting character) and the astonishingly beautiful Evangeline Lilly brings some real heart as the most likable character of the film.

Stephen Fry chews the scenery amusingly, Sylvester McCoy does respectably with Radagast wisely being given a backseat and Bard is well played. The best asset of the film though is Smaug. Right from his design, the best-looking dragon design since that for Dragonslayer. To how cunning, manipulative and physically mighty he is. And to Benedict Cumberbatch’s(one of the most talented actors to date) booming, sly, sinister and really quite phenomenal voice-work in definitely the most evil role he has done to date. The film absolutely nails the scene between Bilbo and Smaug, and Smaug and Cumberbatch have much to thank for that, as well as the writing being the best it is. While the film is not faithful at all really to Tolkein’s The Hobbit apart from some details- it’s often more Lord of the Rings-feeling(though not as good) than The Hobbit- the first half of the scene between Bilbo and Smaug does show clear evidence of fidelity, with the dialogue almost straight out of the book.

Overall, judging it as a stand-alone- which in all honesty it deserves to be, one of those things that I’m getting sick of repeating but it’s necessary because of how much of a problem it seems to be(not quite as bad as people having no regard for other people’s opinions and making out they’re the only ones that are right, there’s a lot going on here too)- The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug was a flawed but very entertaining film and superior to its predecessor from personal opinion. 7.5/10 Bethany Cox

What on earth was Peter Jackson playing at?

I thought the first Hobbit film, AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY, was just about passable, although spoilt by the inclusion of random CGI action scenes and a general lowbrow comedy feel. Unbelievably, this sequel, THE DESOLATION OF SMAUG, is even worse. Peter Jackson’s once undeniable talents as a director seem to be rapidly departing him, as he’s churned out a random CGI kid’s adventure film which has virtually no resemblance to the middle section of the Tolkien novel.

The problem with this overlong and incredibly dull movie is the amount of extraneous material. Whoever thought it was good idea to bring back Legolas (complete with CGI eyes this time around) was an idiot. His ridiculous fight scenes are an embarrassment. I could just about cope with Arwen’s presence in THE LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy, but Evangeline Lilly’s presence here is unforgivable.

The CGI is constant and unending. Most of the backdrops are done with CGI, and even the orcs are now CGI too. They look poor, very poor. We even get CGI moths and butterflies and CGI bumblebees. Jackson has no idea that less is more when it comes to computer effects and instead keeps plonking them in constantly, resulting in a film which looks fake from beginning to end. Performances across the board are poor – the actors are merely required to interact with CGI scenery after all, and a sense of weariness and exasperation has set in – and the long-winded bit where Bilbo finally makes it to Smaug’s lair is sleep-inducing, it’s so dragged out. However, the stupid barrels-down-the-rapids sequence has to be the nadir of the whole thing…