Saw (2004)

• Year: 2004
• Released: 29 Oct 2004
• Country: United States
• Adwords: 8 wins & 10 nominations
• IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387564/
• Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/Saw_UNRATED
• Metacritics: https://www.metacritic.com/movie/saw
• Available in: 720p, 1080p, 2160p
• Language: English
• MPA Rating: R
• Genre: Horror, Mystery, Thriller
• Runtime: 103 min
• Writer: Leigh Whannell, James Wan
• Director: James Wan
• Cast: Cary Elwes, Leigh Whannell, Danny Glover
• Keywords: cult film, detective, horror, torture, doctor,

	7.6/10
	46/100
	51% – Critics
	84% – Audience

Saw Storyline

Two men wake up at opposite sides of a dirty, disused bathroom, chained by their ankles to pipes. Between them lies a dead man loosely clutching a hand-held tape player and a handgun. Each finds a tape for the player in their back pocket. They play the tapes. One is threatened, the other isn’t. But they have a task: One must kill the other by 6:00, or his wife and daughter will die. They find hacksaws in a toilet, and try to cut the chains, but it doesn’t work. They are the two newest victims of the Jigsaw Killer. In a flashback, we learn of Amanda, a girl who falls victim to the Jigsaw Killer. On her head is a mask, which is hooked into her lower jaw. There is a timer on it. Only one key will unlock it, and that key is in the digestive tract of her cell mate who lies paralyzed on the opposite side of the room. If she doesn’t unlock the mask in time, her lower jaw will be ripped wide open. She survives, but her cell mate doesn’t. Through a series of flashbacks, we learn of more victims, and of the nearly-successful capture of the Jigsaw Killer, who doesn’t actually kill his victims. Instead, he finds ways to make them kill either themselves, or each other, and he thinks the entire ‘game’ out perfectly, with no other ways out. Or so it would seem.

Saw Play trailer

Saw Photos

Saw Torrents Download

Saw Subtitles Download

Saw Movie Reviews

Carpentry

I accidentally stumbled onto this one when I googled how to make a wooden pencil box. I wasn’t disappointed

I +Saw+ it last night

“Saw,” a film that was originally planned for a straight-to-video release but after receiving positive nods at test screenings, was finally given the green light in October 2004 – just in time for Halloween. “Saw” contains one of the those plots that shows you everything it’s got up its sleeve, then doubles-back on itself three-fourths of the way through and reveals something entirely new.

It’s not hard to see why this almost hit the straight-to-video fodder list. I mean, people will closely observe that it obviously contains the traits of its successors, namely “Seven” (1995), and that may be all the ammunition the haters will need to trash it. Already, I see that the IMDb voters have averaged “Saw” a 7.5, with those people who have rated it with an “8” or a “10” being neck-and-neck at the polls.

But I begin with reassurances that “Saw” is a genius thriller, if not entirely original or daring. The film does its best to exploit the claustrophobia and mounting tension that collects as it progresses. “Saw” will also make you think twice about bladed objects as well.

Ironically, the title has very little to do with plot, as there is no chainsaw-wielding maniac on the loose as the ghastly cover art of a severed foot would imply. The only saws here are the ones the two main characters Lawrence (Cary Elwes) and Adam (Leigh Whannell, also the film’ screenwriter) have been given.

The two men awaken to find themselves chained to lead pipes in a decrepit public bathroom. In the middle of the floor, is a dead body that’s surrounded in a pool of its own blood, with a gun in one hand and a tape recorder in the other. As it would turn out, they’re the latest victims of a serial killer known as the “Jigsaw Killer.”

Jigsaw has a nasty little way of torturing his victims by trapping them in a situation where they have to kill if they want to survive. As Lawrence explains, technically Jigsaw is not a killer, simply because he hasn’t killed anyone; the victims do that for him. As one fortunate victim observes, who survived her ordeal, she is bound to a chair with a reversed bear trap-like device strapped to her head with pliers wired into her upper and lower jaws. A timer is on the device and if she does not locate a key before it runs out, her mouth will be ripped open and no more pretty face. In order to get out, she must open up the stomach of a dead man lying on the floor next her to get the key.

As Jigsaw ever so carefully points out to his victims, he doesn’t just choose them at random. To him, they’re all perfectly immoral individuals and he uses their immorality to set up horrific situations where the victim rarely survives the trap; in essence, life is its own reward because Jigsaw’s victims don’t value it, as he explains to the one young woman lucky enough to fight through his plan. Also on the case of Jigsaw, are two detectives Tapp (Danny Glover) and Sing (Ken Leung), who bring forth the news of Jigsaw’s previous victims in one particularly gruesome flashback sequence.

Lawrence is pretty well aware of the case of Jigsaw, as even once he was considered a suspect by the police. As you would have it, Adam is not especially trustful of Lawrence being that he seems to know a lot and is not reporting many details to him. They realize, however, that if they are going to survive this nightmare, they’re going to have to play into Jigsaw’s game, observe the clues he’s willing to give them, and ultimately make it out alive.

“Saw” was directed admirably by James Wan and written by Whannell, who also makes an effective victim alongside Elwes. Elwes, a highly underrated actor, is given a chance to shine here, even though this really isn’t an actor’s movie, as it is more in the hands of the director. However, we do get a sense of the desperation of the two leads, who soon realize that they’re not the only ones trapped in this madman’s game.

“Saw” does benefit from its moody atmosphere, which may cover up any of the film’s shortcomings. Towards the end, it does lose pace a little bit as things seem to be spiraling down the haunted house route, but quickly regains momentum as it draws to a close. I know that despite its flaws, I was glued to the seat and really “in” the film’s tight tension, which thankfully doesn’t let up.

Is “Saw” a genre classic? Certainly. Is it a classic like “Seven”? I don’t know. There’s a lot to consider when pondering a question with so much baggage like that one. I liked it, but I’m not so sure about the news that a sequel is in the works. This seems a lot like a stand-alone-type movie, that of which doesn’t need to get bogged down by the weight of unnecessary sequels.

8/10

A puzzling game worth playing

Finally saw all the ‘Saw’ films prior to seeing ‘Jigsaw’ (as part of my wanting to see as many 2017 films as possible this year, during a quieter and less intensive period). Heard a lot about the films, good and bad, but wanted to see them for myself to know what to expect.

The films as an overall series are a very mixed bag. The first ‘Saw’ is very problematic but is one of the better films of the ‘Saw’ series. It is very easy to see why people will dislike it, and no it is not because of the full throttle horror-like elements that are not for the faint hearted. Some of the story is ridiculous with large lapses in logic, Danny Glover’s character’s actions will have one screaming in frustration at the television screen. Some of the script is tight, other parts are half-baked and silly and Elwes’ character’s back-story had some taut tension but that it had some melodramatic parts with frustrating character behaviour.

Some of the acting is not good. Cary Elwes seems to be thinking like he’s acting in a very over-heated melodrama that would have been out of date even in the period when they were in fashion. Danny Glover’s performance is also a mess, with a mix of over-compensating and not looking interested. Even for the film’s mood, some of the editing is chaotic.

However, for a film that didn’t have a high budget ‘Saw’ visually doesn’t look too bad on the whole, effective even. There is a real sense of unsettling claustrophobia induced in the lighting, setting and photography. Music has its eeriness.

Not everybody fares badly in the acting. Michael Emerson has an unnerving presence and Monica Potter and Leigh Whannell also do a decent job. Then there is Tobin Bell, not easy to forget him after this film. James Wan does more than competently in the director’s chair, even with the inexperience.

Despite its ridiculousness, the story is also edge-of-your-seat and highly atmospheric. There is genuine dread, some truly imaginative traps and kills and much of it throughout is disturbing and creepy. ‘Saw’ is notable in particular not just for the traps/kills but also for its bold twists, the character of Jigsaw (the modus operandi, impulse and justification setting him apart from most characters of his type) and an unforgettably shocking ending.

Overall, very problematic but effective. 7/10 Bethany Cox