Snatch (2000)

8.3/10
55/100
74% – Critics
93% – Audience

Snatch Storyline

Turkish and his close friend/accomplice Tommy get pulled into the world of match fixing by the notorious Brick Top. Things get complicated when the boxer they had lined up gets badly beaten by Mickey, who comes into the equation after Turkish, an unlicensed boxing promoter wants to buy a caravan off of Travellers. They then try to convince Mickey not only to fight for them, but to lose for them too. Whilst all this is going on, a huge diamond heist takes place, and a fistful of motley characters enter the story, including ‘Cousin Avi’, ‘Boris The Blade’, ‘Franky Four Fingers’ and ‘Bullet Tooth Tony’. Things go from bad to worse as it all becomes about the money, the guns, and the damned dog.

Snatch Play trailer

Snatch Photos

Snatch Torrents Download

720pbluray449.71 MBmagnet:?xt=urn:btih:513EC39C73135C43AACACECDC78B300161902A45
1080pbluray1.64 GBmagnet:?xt=urn:btih:723FA4FD2EDCF499B5211E17940811260AFEBEEC
2160pbluray5.41 GBmagnet:?xt=urn:btih:FED3D81A717ECE0E5E05225DBCCA7D166BF3FAFE

Snatch Subtitles Download

subtitle Snatch.2000.BRRip.Arg
Arabicsubtitle Snatch
Brazilian Portuguesesubtitle Snatch
Bulgariansubtitle Snatch
Chinesesubtitle Snatch
Chinesesubtitle Snatch
Chinesesubtitle Snatch
Croatiansubtitle Snatch.2000.720p.BluRay.x264.
Dutchsubtitle Snatch
Finnishsubtitle Snatch
Hebrewsubtitle Snatch
Italiansubtitle Snatch
Malaysubtitle Snatch
Norwegiansubtitle Snatch 2000 1080p BluRay 6CH 1 9GB MkvCage
Portuguesesubtitle Snatch
Serbiansubtitle Snatch
Spanish
Thaisubtitle snatch
Turkishsubtitle Snatch

Snatch Movie Reviews

Perfect

This movie is perfect in all its categories: credits, sound track, production, casting, writing, photography, editing, acting, and direction. 10/10.

I was amazed with the freedom of the use of the camera. This movie will change the way movies are made. Slow-mo, stills, black and white, and color were all used to brilliant effect.

I must pick out specific actors who were just over the top – meaning 10+!

Jason Statham as “Turkish” is simply superb – a star of very high caliber. (You should see him in anything he made, and read my comment about John Carpenter’s movie: “Ghosts of Mars.”)

Alan Ford as “Brick Top” is terrifying – his forced speaking style made me think that he was chewing on the flesh of his previous victim.

Vinnie Jones as “Bullet Tooth Tony” is total tough head to foot tough – a walking brick wall – a marine for all seasons – none tougher.

Brad Pitt as “Mickey O’Neil” is utterly 110% convincing. I never liked Mr. Pitt’s work before this – but this one totally sold me – he is as solid an actor as ever came out of Hollywood… and better!

Finally, Guy Ritchie should be recognized as a Michelangelo of film.

-LD

Lock, Stock, and Many Smoking Barrels

The release of Tarantino’s “Pulp Fiction” in 1994 prompted a schism in the staid gangster movie genre: the standard hallmarks – serious characters, gunfights, intrigue and damsels in distress – were enhanced with snappy dialogue, and gallows humour. The biggest change however was the introduction of the mobius strip-style plot line, where the concept of time is no longer linear, instead constantly folding in upon itself, flitting between past, present and future that forces the viewer to pay close attention lest they miss some subtle detail. Inevitably, numerous copycat films emerged that tried to capitalize on Tarantino’s success, but it wasn’t until 1998 when Guy Ritchie, an unknown British director, took on the challenge that a successor was found. Now Ritchie is determined to prove that his first time out wasn’t a fluke.

Turkish is a young man with an entrepreneurial bent, who, when he’s not running his gambling operation, manages bareknuckle boxers. Through a business deal gone wrong, he becomes acquainted with one Mickey O’Neil, a mumbling manic motor-mouthed piker who also happens to be a one-punch marvel. Turkish persuades Mickey to join his stable of fighters, but soon discovers that Mickey has his own agenda, and gets Turkish in trouble with the gangsters who run the underground boxing circuit. Other characters that become involved in the drama include a four-fingered degenerate gambler/jewel thief, a vicious boxing promoter, a gang of inept robbers, a polite hitman, a crazed Russian gun runner, a group of Irish gypsies, a crooked New York jeweler and a pugnacious pet. The common thread binding them all is a perfect diamond the size of a peach pit. If you aren’t confused yet, you soon will be.

“Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels”, Mr. Madonna’s (Ritchie) first film, was shot on a small budget, with a no-name cast (except for football bad boy Vinnie Jones) and quickly became a rousing success at home and found receptive audiences abroad. While not a technically a sequel “Snatch” is stylistically very similar to “Lock, Stock…”: Ritchie utilizes his trademark bombastic staccato sequences, and repeatedly bounces off on radical tangents to throw the viewer off balance. He did however opt for a decidedly darker satirical tone in this film, that may make some people uncomfortable (think “Very Bad Things”). What struck me as particularly daring was his decision to create a story with such a voluminous cast.

Ritchie faced a daunting task with this film: how, with roughly twenty principal characters, does one adequately flesh out each character, and not hopelessly confuse the audience? The feat was made doubly difficult, as several cast members are big name stars. Somehow Ritchie manages – each actor is full bodied, receives ample screen time, and no one character is the centerpiece. With so many talented actors, it is difficult to pick out one performance that stands out: Rade Serbedzija is hilarious as the mad Russian who blithely burns through each of his nine lives, as is Vinnie Jones’ manic gentleman hitman. On the other end of the spectrum, is Alan Ford as Brick Top, the promoter with a penchant for pigs, who epitomizes cold-blooded viciousness. If forced to pick my favorite however, I would have to go with Brad Pitt

Pitt resurrects his trailer trash look from “Kalifornia” and adopts a nearly indecipherable brogue that sounds like my best friend’s Uncle Wally on a bad day. As Mickey O’Neil, the hard drinking wily grifter and part-time pugilist, Pitt displays a wide range of emotions, demonstrating again that he is not only a star, but also a gifted character actor. And I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the dog that subtly stole every scene he appeared in.

While “Snatch” initially struggles to find its stride, and is very similar to Ritchie’s earlier film, it is fresh and funny enough to make you forget any minor shortfalls and stand on its own.

Good, but it’s not a film for most folks….

My summary sounds a bit vague, so let me explain. “Snatch.” is a very, very, very bloody and violent film. It also has a lot of very rough language and a bit of nudity. So, it’s obviously not a film you show your kids, your mother-in-law or Father Jenkins!! This isn’t as much a complaint as an observation–one you really should heed before you try watching the film. I just can’t see most folks gravitating to a movie like this one, though if you do, it IS incredibly unique and well made.

This film begins with a jewel robbery in which a nearly baseball-sized diamond is stolen. While this might seem like a great thing for the thieves, it sets of a LONG series of violent events as practically every gang in the UK seems willing to kill to get it. Most of these gangs are insanely dangerous, while some are comically stupid and a few are really hard to size up. Repeatedly, folks are killed and repeatedly the diamond changes hands. Who, ultimately, will get the diamond and who will survive? You’ll have no idea up until the final crazy ending.

“Snatch.” is an incredibly stylish film–quite artistic in the way it is pieced together. It is even more stylish than Tarantino’s “Kill: Bill” movies. And, the plot is amusing (while it isn’t nauseating or scaring the life out of you). A thoroughly unpredictable and ROUGH film. If it’s the sort of thing you like, you’ll love it. As for me, I rate the film highly but it really isn’t the sort of thing I like because of its excesses and I felt a bit uneasy laughing through the carnage (and, oddly, the film is quite funny). Worth seeing for the right crowd.